Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Max the cutoff for splat penalty much higher #22545

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

One proposal for #22370. I took @vtjnash 's changes, put a nice simple number on them, and also upped the splatting length. Not entirely sure how to argue specifics here.

@andyferris
Copy link
Member

Very cool.

@andyferris
Copy link
Member

OSX build timed out...

@musm
Copy link
Contributor

musm commented Jul 27, 2017

Run nanosoldier here?

@andyferris
Copy link
Member

Let's see if I can do this...

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = "master")

@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, vs = ":master")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here. cc @ararslan

@Jutho
Copy link
Contributor

Jutho commented Mar 17, 2018

Is this still on the table for julia 1.0. Maybe it's worth trying to more gradually increase each of the three parameters individually in order to investigate their effect on the benchmarks?

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Aug 5, 2019

doesn't apply anymore (these constants are gone)

@vtjnash vtjnash closed this Aug 5, 2019
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the patch-6 branch August 5, 2019 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants